The Miocene/ Oligocene boundary and the use of the term aquitanian
By: Eames, F.E.
Material type: ArticleDescription: 388-392pp.Subject(s): Miocene boundary - Use of term aquitanian | Oligocene boundary - Use of term aquitanian | Stratigraphy In: Geological magazine : Vol. 90 Iss. 1-6 Year. 1953Summary: Abstract It is considered that some fossils, e.g. Orbulina and Miogypsina, are good indicators that beds containing them are of post-Oligocene age, and that the ages of some beds in certain parts of the world require reconsideration; mention is made of successions in Morocco, Venezuela, and Peru. It is recommended that the use of the term “Aquitanian” be restricted to beds of basal Miocene age.Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Article | Library and Information Centre Periodical Section | Bound Journal Collection | Not for loan | 002541_68 | ||
Serials/Scientific Journal | Library and Information Centre Periodical Section | Bound Journal Collection | 550 GEO (Browse shelf) | Available | 002541 |
Abstract
It is considered that some fossils, e.g. Orbulina and Miogypsina, are good indicators that beds containing them are of post-Oligocene age, and that the ages of some beds in certain parts of the world require reconsideration; mention is made of successions in Morocco, Venezuela, and Peru. It is recommended that the use of the term “Aquitanian” be restricted to beds of basal Miocene age.
There are no comments for this item.