Facies changes versus sliding - A reply
By: Hardie, W.G
.
Material type: 
ArticleDescription: 114-116pp.Subject(s): Facies changes - Reply | Reply - Bailey of the interpretation of thickness changes - Eilde quartzite - Scotland | Reply - Bailey of the interpretation of thickness changes - Eilde schist - Loch leven area - Scotland
In:
Geological magazine : Vol. 90 Iss. 1-6 Year. 1953Summary: Extract
In my recent paper on the Lochaber Series (Hardie, 1952), I gave detailed facts about the lithology of several of the stratigraphical units, and I concluded that the remarkable thickness variations were due to original sedimentary processes rather than to mechanical rearrangement. Sir Edward Bailey, in his paper in this current number of the Geological Magazine, strongly disagrees with my views, and argues in favour of sliding. In reply I would like to make the following three points.
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Article
|
Library and Information Centre Periodical Section | Bound Journal Collection | Not for loan | 002541_16 | ||
Serials/Scientific Journal
|
Library and Information Centre Periodical Section | Bound Journal Collection | 550 GEO (Browse shelf) | Available | 002541 |
Extract
In my recent paper on the Lochaber Series (Hardie, 1952), I gave detailed facts about the lithology of several of the stratigraphical units, and I concluded that the remarkable thickness variations were due to original sedimentary processes rather than to mechanical rearrangement. Sir Edward Bailey, in his paper in this current number of the Geological Magazine, strongly disagrees with my views, and argues in favour of sliding. In reply I would like to make the following three points.
There are no comments for this item.