logo
Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Discussion on Sm - Nd isotopic age of Precambrian - Cambrian boundary in China

By: Turnbull, M.J.M.
Contributor(s): Moorbath, S | Yang Jiedong | Sun Weiguo.
Material type: ArticleArticleDescription: 571-574pp.Subject(s): Isotope age - China | Precambrian - Cambrian boundary - China | Sm - Nd method | Phanerozoic stratigraphic correlation In: Geological magazine : Vol. 134 Iss. 1-6 Year. 1997Summary: M. J. M. Turnbull & S. Moorbath comment: The paper of Yang et al. (1996) describes a novel dating approach, using the Sm–Nd method on phosphatic material, to determine the age of the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. The dates reported are of a precision which, in light of the relatively small range of 147Sm/144 Nd ratios (0.09–0.17), is surprising. We have recalculated the published data using the ISOPLOT program of Ludwig (1991) and this is shown below in Table 1. These results cast considerable doubt on the statistical analysis of Yang et al. (1996). While this technique may have utility with Precambrian successions it would appear to be of limited use for the high precision dating required for Phanerozoic stratigraphic correlation.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode
Article Article Library and Information Centre
Periodical Section
Bound Journal Collection Not for loan 002523_129
Serials/Scientific Journal Serials/Scientific Journal Library and Information Centre
Periodical Section
Bound Journal Collection 550 GEO (Browse shelf) Available 002523

M. J. M. Turnbull & S. Moorbath comment: The paper of Yang et al. (1996) describes a novel dating approach, using the Sm–Nd method on phosphatic material, to determine the age of the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. The dates reported are of a precision which, in light of the relatively small range of 147Sm/144 Nd ratios (0.09–0.17), is surprising. We have recalculated the published data using the ISOPLOT program of Ludwig (1991) and this is shown below in Table 1. These results cast considerable doubt on the statistical analysis of Yang et al. (1996). While this technique may have utility with Precambrian successions it would appear to be of limited use for the high precision dating required for Phanerozoic stratigraphic correlation.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Copyright © 2019 Geological Survey & Mines Bureau. All Rights Reserved.

Developed in Association with Finco Technologies (Pvt) Ltd

Powered by Koha